Speculation About Jodha Akbar

Maharani Jodha Bai never existed, but her existence was very clearly created and we all fell into the trap.

Whenever a Hindu Rajput talks about the betrayal of a Mughal, some Mughal lovers try to silence him by taking the name of Jodhabai!

It is told how Jodha accepted Akbar's subordination or married him! But no historian of Akbar's period has described the love story of Jodha and Akbar.

All those historians have mentioned only 5 wives of Akbar! 

1.Saleema Sultan
2.Mariam ud Zamani
3.Razia Begum
4.Qasim Banu Begum
5.Bibi Daulat Shad

Akbar himself did not mention his marriage to any Hindu queen even in his autobiography Akbarnama. But as part of a conspiracy to humiliate the Hindu Rajputs, some historians later spread a false rumour in the 18th century, about 300 years after Akbar's death, by calling “Mariam ud Zamani” Jodha Bai.

And based on this rumour, false tales of the love story of Akbar and Jodha were started! Whereas according to Akbarnama and Jahangir Nama itself, there was nothing like this!

In the 18th century, Maryam was given the name of Harkha Bai and the false identity of her being the daughter of Man Singh was started by calling her a Hindu. 

Then at the end of the 18th century, a British writer James Todd, in his book "Analysis and Antiques of Rajasthan", started calling this queen, who became Harkha Bai from Mariam, as Jodha Bai.

In this way, this lie became so strong that today lie has become a part of the curriculum of schools in India and this lie has come to the lips of people like the truth!

And with the help of this lie, an attempt is made to humiliate the Rajputs! Some unanswered questions start flashing in the minds of people!

Can the Indian Kshatriyas, famous all over the world for their bravery and willingness to die for glory and honour, ever make such a compromise with their identity??

Can any of the thousands of Kshatriyas who performed Jauhar together in the Agni Kund willingly marry a Mughal?

'Akbarnama' written by Akbar's courtier 'Abul Fazal' there was no mention of Jodhabai anywhere in the entire book!

Another historical book 'Tuzuk-e-Jahangiri' which is the autobiography of Jahangir also does not mention his mother Jodhabai even once!

Yes, there was definitely mention of Heer Kunwar and Harka Bai in some places. Now all the historical claims about Jodha Bai were being considered false. 

After reading some more books and information available on the internet, the reality came to light that there is no mention or name of “Jodha Bai” anywhere in the entire history!

A new thing came to light in this investigation, which is very shocking! Based on some facts recorded in history, it was found that King Bharmal of Amer was gifted a Persian maid named 'Rukma' in dowry, who also had a young daughter.

Being Rukma's daughter, the girl was called 'Rukma-Bitti'. The Queen of Amer named Rukma Bitti 'Heer Kunwar'. Since Heer Kunwar was brought up in Rajputana, she was well-versed in the customs and traditions of Rajputs. It seemed familiar!

King Bharmal sometimes called her Heer Kunwarni and sometimes Harka. 

King Bharmal fooled Akbar and got his Persian maid Rukma's daughter Heer Kunwar married to Akbar, whom Akbar later named Mariam-uz-Zamani.

Since King Bharmal had given her Kanyadaan, hence in the historical texts, Heer Kunwarni was described as the daughter of King Bharmal. Whereas in reality, she was not a Kachchhwaha princess, but a slave-daughter!

Raja Bharmal had done this marriage as a compromise or in Rajputi language, turmeric-sandalwood. There are many books written about this marriage in Arabia.

We ("ونحن في شك حول أكبر أو جعل الزواج راجبوت الأميرة في هندوستان آرياس كذبة لمجلس") believe that there is a suspicion that, similarly, in the books kept in the Mallik National Museum and Library of Iran, it is written that an Indian Mughal ruler was married to the daughter of a Persian maid!

It is clearly written in 'Akbar-e-Mahuriyat' that (ہم راجپوت شہزادی یا اکبر کے بارے میں شک میں ہیں) We have doubts about this Hindu Nikah because at the time of the Nikah, there were no tears in anyone's eyes in the Raj Bhawan nor was there a Hindu baby shower ceremony.

Sikh religion Guru Arjun and Guru Gobind Singh had said about this marriage that Kshatriyas have now learned to use both swords and intelligence, meaning Rajputana has now started using intelligence along with swords!

In the 17th century, when Parsi came to visit India, he wrote in his work “Parsi Titta” “This Indian king is sending a Persian prostitute right into the harem, so may our God (Ahura Mazda) give this king heaven!”

Rao and Bhats had a special place in the courts of Indian kings, they used to write the history of the king and sing Viradavali. He has clearly written:

“The Turkan army came to Amer and took away Gyali Paswan Kumari, Ran Rajya Rajputa and took Itihasa for the first time and won without a fight! (1563 AD).

Meaning, the Mughal army comes to Amer Fort and takes away a maid's daughter in marriage. O Rajputs born for war, you won the first victory in history without fighting in 1563 AD!

These are some such facts, from which one thing can be understood that someone deliberately tampered with the historical facts with the aim of demeaning the glorious Kshatriya society and this evil attempt is still continuing!

But now this conspiracy will not last long.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who Was Ravana in His Previous Life?

Ravana, the primary antagonist of the epic Ramayana, is a complex character with a rich background that spans multiple lives, according to Hindu Dharma.  His previous life before being born as Ravana, the king of Lanka, is detailed in various texts and scriptures, most notably in the Ramayana and its other versions, as well as in some Puranic texts. In his previous life, Ravana was said to be a gatekeeper of Vaikuntha, the abode of Lord Vishnu, and his name was Jaya.  Along with Vijaya, his fellow gatekeeper (both were considered to be Jaya-Vijaya, the two gatekeepers of the lord Vishnu's abode), he was cursed by the Four Kumaras -  S anaka (Ancient), Sanatana (Eternal), Sanandana (Ever Joyful) and Sanatkumara (Ever Young) . The Four Kumaras are manas-putras (mind-born sons) of Brahma, and they cursed them because they were stopped by Jaya and Vijaya from meeting Vishnu.  Once four Kumaras went to Vaikunta to worship the lord Vishnu. The doorkeepers thought them to b...
Read more

The Indian Financier for the British empire

The British used to beg in front of this King. For the welfare of the people, 'Shrimant Maharaja Tukojirao Holkar II' had given a loan of one crore rupees to the British. Maharajadhiraj Raj Rajeshwar Sawai Shri Sir Tukoji Rao II Holkar XI Bahadur[ GCSI CIE (3 May 1835 – 17 June 1886) was the Maharaja of Indore (Holkar State) and a member of the Maratha Holkar dynasty. His birth name was Shrimant Yukaji Jaswant Holkar. He was the son of Raja Shrimant Santoji Rao Holkar, from the collateral branch of the Holkar dynasty. This king of Indian history, far from bowing his head before the British, he never even undermined the power of the British. Maharaja Tukojirao Holkar II had made the British themselves his debtor by giving a loan of crores of rupees to the British. He forced the British to beg in front of him. During that time, this king, known as 'Maharaja of Central India', had given one crore rupees to the British. At that time the British were working on the railway p...
Read more

Shah Jahan & Jahanara - Part of History Avoided

Shah Jahan made his daughter Jahanara his wife after the death of his wife Mumtaz. Why were we not taught this in history?   Let us know how leftist historians called the emperor of lust, the messiah of love . In the history of the country, leftist historians have always called the lustful Mughals great, out of which Shahjahan has been presented as an example of love and why not, if the man who kept eight thousand women in his harem shows more interest in one of them, then it will be called his love. You will be surprised to know that Mumtaz's name was not Mumtaz Mahal, rather her real name was 'Arjumand-Banu-Begum'. Moreover, the love between Shahjahan and Mumtaz, which is so much talked about, was neither Shahjahan's first wife nor his last. Mumtaz was the fourth of Shah Jahan's seven prime wives. This means that Shah Jahan had married three times before Mumtaz, and even after marrying her he was not satisfied even after that he married three more times. Even wit...
Read more